Petar Kotevski personal page
Proudly powered by
News & Events
Ideas & Rants
Game Reviews
Other Interests
About Me

DISCLAIMER: The articles and commentary expressed on this site are personal and do not represent in any way the opinions of any companies that I work for (or have worked for) or represent (or have represented in the past). The program code and instruction on this page is provided "as-is". I am not responsible for any damage occurring from using that code or following any instructions as specified here.

BioShock Infinite

Duration/Variety: 4
Gameplay: 4
Story/Pacing: 9
Visual Quality: 8
Sound Quality: 10
Impression: 9

Why did Bioshock Infinite need to be a game?

I don't have an answer to that question. I don't think anyone at Irrational has the answer to that question - except maybe to say: "Well, we ARE a game developer...".

Ken Levine has shown many times that he is an excellent writer. I would read his books. I would see his movies or plays. Bioshock Infinite is no exception - the setting is evocative, the characters are interesting and layered, the story pacing and dynamic is excellent!

But Bioshock Infinite: the game has multiple personalities. When it is the sweet, entagled story told through the relationship of the two interesting protagonists (Booker and Elizabeth) - it succeeds. When it is the barely competent shooter, devoid of any meaning and only a passing correlation to the story - it fails.

And you know, if that was the only problem - it would still be fine. A lot of good games use their story as a means to drive the player forward. But this is not the case.

Mr. Hyde's game cannot help but exert its maniacal obsession with stereotypical game mechanics over dr.Jekyll's story. It delays its progress while you kill waves and waves of uninspired enemies, because that's what triggers the next story reveal. It sends you on meaningless "The princess is in another castle" quests simply to justify the stereotypical need for "8 to 10 hours of gameplay". It pits you against nonsensical bosses because - you know - that's how games work.

This is not the natural progression in genre that Bioshock: The Original deserved. In this game, everything resembles the greatness of the original, except it has no reason to exist in this new world other than to just remind us that it somehow shares the same "family" with it. Whereas the plasmids in the original were tied to the principal setting and conflict of the game, in this game they are just the thing that the other game had.

So is this game not good?
The chronologically challenged story makes the bitter taste of "oh-no-not-another-arena-encounter" a little sweeter at the end. But it doesn't do enough to justify packaging itself in a clumsy game.

Bioshock Infinite didn't really need to be a game. It would still be as good, and maybe better.
Posted by: Petar , on Saturday, 31 August 2013
Comments still work, right?


(all HTML tags are supported, no formatting will survive unless its written in HTML - not even a new line)

Bot protection: